GMF - The German Marshall Fund of the United States - Strengthening Transatlantic Cooperation

Home  |  About GMF  |  Pressroom  |  Support GMF  |  Contact Us
Follow GMF
Events
GMF celebrates its 40 year history and Founder and Chairman, Dr. Guido Goldman at Gala Dinner May 09, 2013 / Washington, DC

GMF held a celebratory gala dinner at the United States Institute of Peace in Washington, Wednesday May 8.

Audio
Deal Between Kosovo, Serbia is a European Solution to a European Problem May 13, 2013

In this podcast, GMF Vice President of Programs Ivan Vejvoda discusses last month's historic agreement to normalize relations between Kosovo and Serbia.

Andrew Small on China’s Influence in the Middle East Peace Process May 10, 2013

Anchor Elaine Reyes speaks with Andrew Small, Transatlantic Fellow of the Asia Program for the German Marshall Fund, about Beijing's potential role in brokering peace between Israel and Palestine

Events

The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Impact on Transatlantic Relations November 01, 2012 / Warsaw, Poland


2012 US elections discussion in Warsaw

In the run-up to the U.S. 2012 Presidential elections, the GMF Warsaw Office hosted a discussion on the elections and their impact on transatlantic relations.  The Office had the pleasure to host Craig Kennedy, the President of GMF as the guest speaker on the subject during a public event which took place on October 23, 2012.

Mr Kennedy said that an incredible sense of uncertainty is surrounding this year’s elections. With two unsuccessful wars and the financial crisis, this year’s elections are as unpredictable as the 2000 and 1992 votes.

Citing the statistics provided by different public opinion polls, President Kennedy said that Obama is likely to be re-elected for a number of reasons. He has an incredible personality which attracted an extraordinary number of votes four years ago and did not commit any big external policy disasters, even though he has been in office when economy has been in the worse. Romney on the other hand has several disadvantages: not only has he run a mediocre campaign, but is a businessman who appears to be a stiff guy. Several states, such as North Carolina and Nevada have turned to support Romney, but it might not be enough to beat the incumbent President, who is in fact running a successful campaign.

On the U.S. – Europe relations, Mr Kennedy remarked that there would be no big difference should democrats or republicans win. If Europe wants more U.S. involvement, it needs to find a good reason to justify it. An ambitious U.S. foreign policy would certainly attract U.S. interest and could help the new administration address the big challenge – the future of NATO.

But for the internal relations, this campaign actually marks the sharpest contrast of two different ideological visions the U.S. can follow and what the role of the government should be. Both campaigners play to the middle class citizens – especially Mitt Romney, who expresses his support of entrepreneurship and innovation, aspires to recreate the Reagan years of economic performance. He would like to see businesses more independent of government. Barack Obama on the other hand understands that many American families use grants, Medicare support and depend on government for employment and thus tries to address the insecurity of the middle class. This election will show where the U.S. would go, but the real answer will be seen in four years.