Press Information 2009
For More Information, Please Contact: DEUTSCH
In the U.S.: Will Bohlen: +1 202 683 2609, wbohlen@gmfus.org FRANÇAIS
In Europe: Elizabeth Boswell Rega: +32 2 238 5 283, eboswellrega@gmfus.org ITALIANO
   


SURVEY: GLOBAL ECONOMIC DOWNTURN HAS CHANGED LITTLE ABOUT NORTH AMERICAN, EUROPEAN VIEWS OF IMMIGRATION

~ Political leanings are linked to changing views on immigration; widespread misconceptions about actual immigrant numbers in U.S., Canada, Europe; all countries support permanent over temporary labor programs; support for legalization of illegal immigrants up in Europe and down in U.S.~

 

 

Transatlantic Trends 2009WASHINGTON, DC (December 3, 2009) – The second-annual Transatlantic Trends: Immigration survey shows that while majorities on both sides of the Atlantic are preoccupied with economic troubles, the global financial crisis has not had a strong impact on views toward immigration.

Overall assessments of immigration as more of a problem or an opportunity have gone up slightly from last year; in 2009, 50 percent of Europeans and 54 percent of respondents in the United States described immigration as “more of a problem,” an increase from 43 percent and 50 percent, respectively, in 2008.

The Transatlantic Trends: Immigration public opinion survey addresses immigration and integration issues including the effect of the economic crisis on attitudes toward immigration, immigrants’ labor market impacts and effects on wages, and preferences for temporary vs. permanent labor migration programs. The survey also gauges opinion on a legalization program for illegal immigrants and asks respondents to rate how their government is managing immigration. Transatlantic Trends: Immigration is a project of the German Marshall Fund of the United States (GMF), the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation (U.S.), the Compagnia di San Paolo (Italy), and the Barrow Cadbury Trust (U.K.), with additional support from the Fundación BBVA. It measures public opinion on immigration issues in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain.

Respondents in all countries grossly overestimated the share of immigrants in their countries. Americans thought that 35% of the population in the United States are immigrants (the real number is closer to 14%), Canadians estimated 37% (20% in reality), and Europeans estimated an average of 24% (of the European countries surveyed, Spain and Germany have the highest share at 13%).

“The misconceptions about the numbers of immigrants in the United States, Canada, and Europe, provide a teaching moment for their governments,” said GMF President Craig Kennedy. “The gap can and does change the debate in tangible ways.”

 

Key findings include:

 

ECONOMIC CRISIS HAD LITTLE EFFECT ON ATTITUTES, POLITICAL LEANING IS STRONGER
In all countries except the United States, respondents whose household economic situation got worse in the past year were slightly more likely to be worried about legal immigration. However, the economic crisis has not had a large effect on overall attitudes. Instead, self-described political leaning is much more pronounced when related to changing attitudes -- those on the political right in Europe and describing themselves as Republican in the United States had 7- and 15-point jumps, respectively, in saying that immigration was more of a problem than an opportunity compared to 2008.

SUPPORT FOR LEGALIZATION IS UP IN EUROPE, DOWN IN THE UNITED STATES
Countries were divided on whether or not to give illegal immigrants the opportunity to obtain legal status -- German and French respondents were in favor, Italians and Brits were against, and Dutch, Spanish, and Canadian respondents were split. But all European countries saw an increase in support for legalization over the previous year. The United States showed declining support for a legalization measure (49% supported it in 2008, 44% in 2009).

TRANSATLANTIC MAJORITIES FAVOR PERMANENT OVER TEMPORARY LABOR PROGRAMS
As in 2008, majorities in all countries surveyed indicated that “legal immigrants who come to the country to work” should be given the opportunity to immigrate permanently, rather than forced to return to their countries of origin after a temporary period.

ALL COUNTRIES SUPPORT SOCIAL BENEFITS FOR LEGAL IMMIGRANTS

Majorities in all countries supported providing social benefits and granting political participation rights to legal immigrants, though only France (65%), Italy (53%), and Spain (53%) clearly support granting local voting rights to them.

MEDITERRANEAN COUNTRIES SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT AID TO REDUCE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION
A plurality or majority in the three Mediterranean countries surveyed -- France (44%), Italy (45%), and Spain (51%) -- thought that increasing development aid would be the best way to reduce illegal immigration, favoring this policy over border controls, employer sanctions, and facilitating legal immigration.

ASSESSMENTS OF GOVERNMENT SUCCESS ON IMMIGRATION POLICY VARY GREATLY

Opinions as to how governments are managing immigration differed wildly across countries — British (71%), Spanish (64%), American (63%), and Italian (53%) respondents disapproved of their governments’ management, but Germans (71%), Canadians (59%), the Dutch (53%), and the French (50%) approved of the steps taken thus far.

MAJORITIES IN EUROPE FAVOR IMMIGRATION POLICYMAKING AT EU-LEVEL
A majority in all European countries except the U.K. favored immigration policy formulation by the European Union as a whole, rather than at national or local levels. Across European countries as a whole, support averaged 56% -- but was only at 30% among respondents in the U.K..

 

For the full report and top-line data, see www.transatlantictrends.org

SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS

Transatlantic Trends: Immigrationis a project of the German Marshall Fund of the United States (www.gmfus.org), the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation (www.bradleyfdn.org), the Compagnia di San Paolo (www.compagnia.torino.it), and the Barrow Cadbury Trust (www.bctrust.org.uk), with additional support from the Fundación BBVA.

TNS Opinion was commissioned to conduct the survey using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews. In each country, a random sample of approximately 1,000 men and women, 18 years of age and older, was interviewed. The fieldwork was conducted between September 1, 2009, and September 17, 2009. For results based on the national samples in each of the countries surveyed, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of error attributable to sampling and other random effects is +/- 3 percentage points. For results based on the total European sample, the maximum margin of error is +/- 1.3 percentage points. ###