Skip to main content

The German Marshall Fund of the United States

  • Who we are
    • Programs
      • Alliance for Securing Democracy
      • Asia Program
      • Balkan Trust for Democracy
      • Black Sea Trust for Regional Cooperation
      • Congressional Affairs
      • Europe Program
      • Fund for Belarus Democracy
      • Future of Geopolitics
      • GMF Cities
      • GMF Digital
      • Leadership Programs
      • Mediterranean Program
      • Security and Defense
    • Offices
      • Ankara
      • Belgrade
      • Berlin
      • Brussels
      • Bucharest
      • Paris
      • Warsaw
      • Washington, DC
    • About Us
    • Marshall Plan
    • Our Partners
  • Experts
  • Events
    Apr
    29
    Upcoming Event

    EU-Turkey Relations: Towards a Positive Agenda?

    April 29, 2021 | 3:00PM to 5:00PM CEST
    • Major Conferences & Forums
      GMF brings together hundreds of policymakers, elected officials, academics, and business leaders from around the world to discuss topics from energy to migration, economics to security, urban growth to diplomacy.
    All Events →
  • Our Work
    • Topics
      • America
      • Asia
      • Europe
      • Cities and Regions
      • Security
      • Trade and Economies
      • All Topics
    • Research
      • Publications
      • Transatlantic Takes
    • Perspectives
      • Audio
      • Video
      • Blog post
      • In The News
  • Stay Informed

Photo Credit: Frederic Legrand - COMEO / Shutterstock

In the News

Hopes for Profound Change are Erased

October 2, 2017

Hans Kundnani

This article was originally published in Greek by Kathimerini.

In July I wrote that in the general election that took place last Sunday, Chancellor Angela Merkel could be “re-elected with a mandate to say no to Macron.” What I meant was that the German public looked set to give an endorsement to Merkel’s approach to the eurozone and reject the alternative offered by Social Democrat candidate Martin Schulz, who was (slightly) more open to the new French president’s proposals for reform of eurozone economic governance. In that sense, I expected the German public to send a message that they wanted more of the same.

My prediction turned out to be even truer than I had anticipated. In fact, in so far as German voters sent a message about eurozone policy last Sunday, it was that they wanted not more of the same but rather an even tougher approach. The Social Democrats did as badly as predicted — their worst result since the creation of the Federal Republic in 1949. But the Christian Democrats also did much worse than expected — their second worst result since then. In particular, they lost 1.3 million votes to the economic liberal Free Democrats and 1 million votes to the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, AfD).

The two big winners last Sunday were the two parties that went into the election demanding a tougher approach to the eurozone. During the campaign, Free Democrat candidate Christian Lindner had proposed giving Greece a “new start without the euro” — in effect a resurrection of the idea of a “time out” that Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble proposed in July 2015. The AfD, which started out in 2013 as a party of economists and constitutional lawyers angry about eurozone bailouts, which they considered a breach of the rule of law, has since become more focused on immigration but has hardly softened its position on eurozone policy.

What all this means is that the chances of the breakthrough on eurozone economic governance that many had hoped for are now close to nil. Many in Europe — and beyond — hope that Merkel, with an eye on her legacy, will see sense and push through concessions against the opposition of the Free Democrats, who are widely expected to occupy the all-important finance ministry in a “Jamaica” coalition. But this is largely a case of projection. Even if Merkel were personally inclined to make concessions to Macron — something that is far from clear — she has been weakened by this election.

This puts Macron — who said little about reform of the eurozone in his big speech on Europe at the Sorbonne on Tuesday — in a difficult position. He can either make ambitious demands (such as a significant eurozone budget), which Germany will likely reject, or make modest demands (such as turning the European Stability Mechanism into a “European Monetary Fund,” which even fiscal hawks in Berlin such as Schäuble are in favor of because they see them as a way to increase over other EU member states’ budgets) and claim this as a victory. Either way, the prospects for a real breakthrough that would help overcome the fault lines within the eurozone and make the single currency sustainable are dim.

Kathimerini
Read the full article

Explore: Policy

All Eyes on Germany — Forming a Government

Related Content

Photo Credit: Rokas Tenys / Shutterstock

Transatlantic Take

The Necessity and Impossibility of “Strategic Autonomy”

Jan 10, 2018 | By Hans Kundnani

Atlanticist and “Post-Atlanticist” Wishful Thinking

Jan 3, 2018 | By Hans Kundnani, Jana Puglierin
Strengthening Transatlantic Cooperation

Our Organization

  • About GMF
  • Career Opportunities
  • Our Partners
  • Press Room
  • Support Our Work
  • Core Values

Our Work

  • Leadership
  • Policy
  • Civil Society
  • Research & Analysis

Our Experts

  • Find an Expert

Follow

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Diversity Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Credits

Stay Informed

Don’t miss out on the latest from GMF. Sign up to receive emailed newsletters, announcements, and event notifications.

Subscribe